Data osoittaa $1,000,000,000,000 Bitcoin Movement laukaisi Crypto Sell-Off, sanoo On-Chain analyytikko Willy Woo

Ketjutietojen asiantuntija Willy Woo sanoo, että Bitcoinin viimeaikainen markkinakorjaus johtui hänen mielestään harhaanjohtavista tiedoista, jotka koskevat 1,1 miljardin dollarin arvosta BTC:n liikettä kryptopörssissä Geminissä.

Jonka mukaan miljardien dollarien arvosta BTC:tä

Uudessa twiitissään Woo siteeraa Glassnoden selvennystä, jonka mukaan miljardien dollarien arvosta BTC:tä koskeneet transaktiot olivat sisäisiä, ja sanoo, että varat olivat jo Geminin lompakoissa.

„Markkinat myyvät pois väärän tiedon takia, jonka mukaan Geminiin virtaa 1 miljardin dollarin edestä BTC:tä. Se on 2. kerta, kun se tapahtui viimeisten 30 päivän aikana. Kaavio: vipuvaikutuspositiot realisoituvat, kun kauppiaat myyvät pois. Punaiset pisteet osoittavat väärennettyjen virtojen ajoituksen. (28 000 ja 18 000 BTC vastaavasti)“.“

Kyseiset tiedot tulivat Bitcoin Bank -pörssivirtojen seurantalaitteelta Crypto Quant, joka varoitti seuraajiaan, että Geminiin oli virrannut 19 108 BTC:tä 1,1 miljardin dollarin arvosta.

Woo viittaa useisiin syihin, miksi Crypto Quantin hälytys saattoi olla virheellinen.

„[Crypto Quantin] tietovirhekeskustelu. Lähettikö valas 18 000 BTC:tä Geminiin dumpatakseen markkinat? Vai oliko kyseessä datavirhe? Tämä hälytys lähetettiin 28 300 kauppiaalle, jotka varoittivat valaan polkumyynnistä. Keinottelijat myivät pois minuutteja myöhemmin.“

Että BTC:n kehitys Geminissä hälytyksen antamisen

Analyytikko korostaa, että Gemini ei ole tarpeeksi suuri käsittelemään 1 miljardin dollarin arvoisia Bitcoin-tilauksia, ja toteaa, että pörssin kaupankäyntivolyymi on yleensä vain noin 100-200 miljoonaa dollaria päivässä. Woo sanoo myös, että BTC:n kehitys Geminissä hälytyksen antamisen jälkeen tukee hänen teoriaansa siitä, että kyseessä olevaa Bitcoinia ei ollut tarkoitus myydä.

„Tämä kaavio näyttää Geminin hinnat verrattuna Coinbasen ja Binancen keskiarvoon. Kun varoitus lähetettiin elinkeinonharjoittajille, Gemini-hinta ei laskenut suhteessa muihin, miltä polkumyynti siellä näyttäisi. Itse asiassa se nousi osoittaen netto-ostamista kyseisessä pörssissä.“

Woo lisää, että siirto ei todennäköisesti ole OTC-kauppa.

„Jos tilaus täytettiin heidän OTC-tiskinsä kautta, odotamme, että vastaavat virrat menevät ostajille muissa pöydissä/pörsseissä, tästä ei ole raportoitu. Muuten, jos tämä oli OTC-transaktio, se olisi nousujohteinen johtuen 1 miljardin dollarin hinnan validoinnista.“

The 8 worst-losing cryptocurrencies of the week: ZEN, XVS, ICX, ZEC, DASH, CAKE, AVAX and BCH

The ZEN and CAKE tokens both broke an ascending and parabolic support line.

The ICX was rejected by the long term resistance zone at $ 2.

DASH and ZEC are traded within long-term support areas

The majority of crypto markets have declined significantly since February 21, with some having been significantly more affected than others.

In this article, we’ll take a look at the eight cryptocurrencies that declined the most during the week (February 19-26).

After a period of constant rally that started on November 20, ZEN cryptocurrency hit a record high of $ 86 on February 18. Since then, it has continued to decline.

So far, ZEN has fallen 45%, currently trading near $ 46. Price first rebounded to the fibonacci retracement support 0.5 to $ 47.1, but has since fallen below.

Technical indicators are bearish, and price has moved below the ascending parabolic support line it has been following throughout its rise. It is therefore possible that the uptrend has ended and ZEN has now started to correct.

If so, and although a short-term rebound may occur from this sizable decline, ZEN will likely continue to decline at least to the 0.618 fibonacci retracement level, at $ 38.

The XVS has been declining since it hit a record high of $ 102.94 on February 19

This record high was reached at the 1.61 Fib fibonacci extension of waves 1-3. Thus, the entire uptrend (in orange) that started on January 21 may have ended.

This theory is supported by the bearish cross of the Stochastic Oscillator, although the RSI and MACD are still bullish. Nonetheless, the XVS bounced back to the $ 47 support area, creating two long lower strands.

Thus, a rebound towards the area of ​​72 dollars is likely, but the price must regain this level for the trend to be bullish.

The ICX has been in decline from its high of $ 2.69 on February 19. The decline left a long upper wick in its wake, and the ICX failed to close above the long-term resistance zone of $ 2.

Despite the decline, technical indicators are still bullish.

Additionally, the ICX is trading between the 0.5-0.618 fibonacci retracement levels of the last upward movement. It could therefore find support near the current price area.

The most likely scenario would be that the ICX creates some form of structure before breaking through the resistance zone at $ 2.

The ZEC has been down from its high of $ 203 on February 19. Despite the drop of nearly 50%, the price falling to $ 120, the ZEC validated its previous level of advance, located at $ 110.

Technical indicators are still bullish. As long as the ZEC does not close below this level, the trend remains bullish.

If the ZEC rebounds, the next resistance zone would be at $ 345. This is the 0.382 fibonacci retracement level measured from the historical high of price.

The DASH is down since reaching a peak of $ 335 on 19 February. This drop led the price to the $ 210 area, which previously acted as resistance.

Despite the retest of its support, DASH has yet to rebound, currently trading around $ 215. The weekly close is extremely important as the DASH could either create a bearish Japanese overlap candlestick or a long lower wick.

Technical indicators are still bullish, as evidenced by the bullish cross of the Stochastic Oscillator and the rise of the MACD.

If the DASH price rebounds and validates the $ 210 area as support, the next resistance area would be at $ 500.

The movement of the cryptomonnaie CAKE was parabolic since early January 2021. On 19 February, the CAKE peaked over 21.45 dollars. Since then, it has continued to decline.

The decline took the price below its ascending parabolic support. It also caused the Stochastic Oscillator to cross bearish.

While the CAKE has started a small rebound at the 0.5 to $ 11.12 fibonacci retracement level, it is more likely to decline to the 0.618 to $ 8.68 fibonacci level. A horizontal support is also present at this level.

Despite this decline, CAKE was listed on the Kucoin and VCC exchanges last week (February 15-19).

The rise of AVAX has been almost parabolic since its inception. However, the price has declined since it hit a record high of $ 60.30 on February 10.

The technical indicators are decidedly bearish, as evidenced by the bearish cross of the Stochastic Oscillator, the RSI crossing below 50, and the negative MACD.

Despite the possibility that the trend has turned bearish, the AVAX is trading between the 0.5-0.618 fibonacci retracement support levels. Some kind of rebound is therefore likely, even if AVAX were to eventually decline.

Additionally, the AVAX is approaching a long-term ascending support line, which coincides with the 0.618 fibonacci retracement level.

On February 25, Avalanche also announced a partnership with CTSI, an initiative that could have a positive effect on its price.

The cryptomonnaie BCH is down from its peak at $ 775 February 15. This drop took the BCH to the area at $ 470, which it had previously passed.

Due to a deviation below this level, the support area and its recovery is not as sharp as that of DASH and ZEC. It is still likely that this is a retest of the area. Additionally, both MACD and Stochastic Oscillator are bullish.

While the weekly RSI previously generated a bearish divergence (in blue), a decline has already occurred as a result. Likewise, the RSI is potentially generating a hidden bullish divergence (in green).

Czołowy analityk rynku kryptowalut mówi

Czołowy analityk rynku kryptowalut mówi, że planuje zbudować dużą pozycję w tym stosunkowo mało znanym altcoinie

Wybitny strateg kryptowalutowy i analityk techniczny ujawnia swój plan zbudowania dużej pozycji w mało popularnym altcoinie.

W nowym tweecie, pseudonimowy analityk znany jako Cantering Clark informuje swoich 53 000 zwolenników, że chce zgromadzić nową rasę kryptowalut, która jest Crypto Engine skierowana zarówno do użytkowników przestrzeni zdecentralizowanych finansów (DeFi), jak i do zarządzających portfelami.

„Kolejny projekt, w którym bardzo chętnie zbuduję większą pozycję w ciągu najbliższego roku. DEXTF.“

DEXTF jest protokołem zarządzania aktywami, zaprojektowanym tak, aby ułatwić użytkownikom dywersyfikację inwestycji. Mało znany projekt wykorzystuje token funduszu XTF, który działa jak fundusz indeksowy, ale zamiast tego śledzi wyniki określonych aktywów kryptowalutowych.

 Według strony internetowej protokołu

Menedżerowie funduszy mogą tworzyć i wybijać nowe tokeny funduszy XTF, które śledzą wyniki różnych kryptowalut, pozwalając użytkownikom uzyskać ekspozycję na szeroką gamę monet w jednej inwestycji. Według strony internetowej protokołu, posiadacze mogą handlować swoimi funduszami tokenów XTF on-chain, tak jak fundusze giełdowe.

DEXTF jest wspierany przez nieanonimowy zespół doświadczonych profesjonalistów z dziedziny finansów i inwestycji, w tym ekonomistę Alexa Krügera, który działa jako doradca w projekcie.

Krüger, byczo nastawiony do protokołu, mówi swoim 65.000 zwolennikom na Twitterze, że DEXTF będzie uruchomienie produktów strukturyzowanych lub wstępnie spakowanych pojazdów inwestycyjnych „bardzo szybko“ z celem ostatecznie stać się masywnym źródłem dochodów posiadaczy DEXTF raz na rynkach opcji on-chain podnieść więcej pary.

Produkty strukturyzowane uruchomienie na DEXTF bardzo szybko. Produkty strukturyzowane stanowią główne źródło przychodów dla banków inwestycyjnych. Gdy rynki opcji onchain urosną w wielkość, produkty strukturyzowane powinny wziąć DeFi szturmem i stać się głównym źródłem przychodów dla posiadaczy $DEXTF. https://t.co/a4d9GeqhLR

– Alex Krüger (@krugermacro) 20 lutego 2021 r.

W momencie pisania tego tekstu, DEXTF jest notowany po 2,73 USD, a jego kapitalizacja rynkowa wynosi 39,3 mln USD.

Projekt tokenizacji aktywów DeFi Money Market zamyka swoje drzwi

Posiadacze tokenów DMG udają się na Twittera, aby opłakiwać ich udziały w 75%.

DeFi Money Market, jeden z najwcześniejszych projektów mających na celu wprowadzenie rzeczywistych aktywów do łańcucha, nagle ogłosił wczoraj wieczorem, że „zaprzestał działalności”

„W wyniku dochodzeń regulacyjnych DMM wyłącza się” – czytamy w oświadczeniu na stronie internetowej projektu. „[…] DMM żałuje konieczności tego działania i chciałby podziękować społeczności DMM za wsparcie i aktywny udział w tym projekcie.”

Witryna dostarczyła użytkownikom instrukcje, jak wykupić mTokeny przynoszące zyski i poinformowała, że ​​10 lutego zyski z tokenów spadną do 0%.

„Jesteśmy pewni, że masz pytania, ale niestety nie jesteśmy obecnie w stanie odpowiedzieć na nie” – dodaje oświadczenie.

Projekt potwierdził również zamknięcie w dwóch tweetach:

Wraz z RealT i innymi projektami tokenizacji nieruchomości, Bitcoin Era był jednym z pierwszych, którzy podjęli próbę wprowadzenia rzeczywistych zasobów do krajobrazu DeFi. Oferowali ponad 6% oprocentowanie swoich tokenów zabezpieczone pożyczkami samochodowymi w świecie rzeczywistym. Projekt został uruchomiony przy wsparciu zbudowanej na zamówienie wyroczni Chainlink i przy wsparciu inwestora-miliardera Tima Drapera.

Niektórzy spekulowali, że kontrola regulacyjna, do której zespół odwołuje się w swoim ogłoszeniu, może być powiązana z nieudanym uruchomieniem tokena . Niedługo po sprzedaży tokenów pojawiły się raporty, że dokumenty przesłane przez firmę w celu udowodnienia, że ​​zabezpieczenie pożyczki nieumyślnie ujawniły tożsamość posiadaczy pożyczki.

Crypto Whale dræner pludselig tegnebogen og flytter $ 615.000.000 i Bitcoin i enkelt transaktion

Crypto sleuths sporer en overførsel, der var vidne til, at en stor Bitcoin-hval pludseligt dræner en BTC-tegnebog til hundreder af millioner af dollars.

Den højrullende kryptoenhed flyttede lige 17.473 BTC til en værdi af $ 615 millioner mod et gebyr på ca. $ 3.

Transaktionen blev oprindeligt set med det automatiske distribuerede ledger-overvågningsværktøj kendt som Bitcoin Block Bot.

Ifølge de seneste block explorer-data flyttede hvalen BTC-formuen til tre separate adresser.

En tegnebog med i alt 48 transaktioner modtog 360 BTC. En anden adresse med i alt fem transaktioner indsamlet 17.113 BTC. En tredje adresse med to transaktioner modtog mindre end 1 BTC.

De involverede adresser har ingen kendte bånd til et firma, der investerer eller arbejder i kryptoindustrien. Desuden er den pågældende Bitcoin Bank ikke blevet flyttet til nogen kendte adresser, der ejes af kryptobørser, hvor den kunne handles og sælges på det åbne marked.

BitInfoCharts viser, at den massive hval oprettede den originale tegnebog den 15. januar og modtog en betydelig mængde BTC samme dag.

Med Bitcoin-handel over $ 36.000 siger on-chain analyseplatform WhaleMap, at hvaler synes at være interesserede i at købe BTC-fald på niveauet $ 30.000.

”Sådan handler du hvalbobler for alle, der undrer sig. Der skete også store tilstrømninger til hvalpunge på $ 29.314.

De vil beskytte deres BTC … Dette skal være stærk støtte til Bitcoin på kort sigt og forhåbentlig på lang sigt. ”

Elektronik Kæmpe Mitsubishi Building Blockchain-platform til styring af peer-to-peer-energihandel

Mitsubishi Electric går sammen med Japans førende videnskabs- og teknologiuniversitet Tokyo Tech for at opbygge en blockchain-baseret platform til peer-to-peer (P2P) energihandel.

Projektet er designet til at give folk en optimeret måde at købe og sælge overskydende energi på.

Partnerne siger, at de designer det nye blockchain-baserede økosystem for automatisk at optimere ordrer baseret på udbud og efterspørgsel.

”Hvis målet er at maksimere den mængde overskydende elektricitet, der er tilgængelig på markedet, kan der søges efter det bedste tilbud-bud-match med hensyn til dette fælles mål. Hvis der findes et overskud, vil handelsprisen sandsynligvis falde i henhold til markedsprincipperne …

Hvis prioriteten er overskud fra forbrugere og forbrugere, kan det delte mål justeres for at øge det samlede overskud eller hæve det laveste overskud af alle forhandlere og forbrugere. ”

Mitsubishi siger, at dets system er designet til at behandle et stort antal transaktioner med minimal krævet computerkraft.

Mitsubishi og Tokyo Tech begynder at teste det nye system i april.
Gå ikke glip af et beat – Abonner for at få krypto-mailadvarsler leveret direkte til din indbakke

MicroStrategy hæver sin Bitcoin-reserve med $ 400 mio

  • MicroStrategy planlægger at hæve sin Bitcoin-reserve med $ 400 millioner.
  • Virksomheden har til hensigt at rejse fonden gennem et værdipapirudbud.

Det Nasdaq-børsnoterede Bitcoin (BTC) mest bullish selskab Microstrategy, har afsløret en anden plan om at købe endnu mere Bitcoin. Denne gang foretages den planlagte investering ikke direkte fra reserven. Det planlagde dog at generere kapitalen gennem et nyt konvertibelt obligationsudbud. Det er værd at bemærke, at virksomheden allerede har mere end 400 millioner dollars i sin Bitcoin-reserve, som blev åbnet i et forsøg på at sikre sig mod inflation.

MicroStrategy kan øge sin Bitcoin-reserve til $ 1 mia

Det Virginia-baserede business intelligence-selskab gjorde dette kendt mandag og sagde, at $ 400 millioner fortsætter fra de planlagte konvertible obligationer vil blive rettet til Bitcoin – hvilket betyder flere køb. Med et sådant køb vil virksomheden sandsynligvis oprette historie som den første virksomhed, der har 1 milliard dollar i sin Bitcoin-reserve inden for et år. I øjeblikket ser virksomheden omkring $ 785 millioner i Bitcoin.

Hele midlerne blev kun akkumuleret i tre store Bitcoin-køb. Det første og andet køb blev registreret mellem august og september.

Inden for denne periode købte virksomheden mere end 38.000 Bitcoin til en anslået pris på $ 425 millioner. Igen hævede MicroStrategy den 4. december Bitcoin-reserven med et yderligere køb til en værdi af over 300 millioner dollars, ifølge selskabets arkivering til den amerikanske regulator. I alt ejer virksomheden 40.824 Bitcoin.

Corporate Bitcoin-beholdning

Alle Bitcoin-køb fra MicroStrategy kommer, da de mener, at kryptokurrency er en bedre hæk for at forhindre inflation med fiat-valuta. Flytningen havde udløst flere virksomhedsinvesteringer i den førende kryptokurrency. For eksempel havde Square Inc. annonceret overtagelsen af $ 50 millioner i Bitcoin efter MicroStrategy. Andre populære virksomheder, der ejer Bitcoin, inkluderer Galaxy Digital, Voyager, Riot Blockchain osv.

SEC sues Ripple – XRP price collapses and delistings begin

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is taking legal action against Ripple for the sale of unregistered securities for $ 1.38 billion, via XRP. As a direct consequence, the price of XRP collapses and the delisting of cryptocurrency begins on some platforms.

SEC goes to war with RIPple

It’s now official, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is taking legal action against Ripple and its cryptocurrency, XRP . Ripple CEO, Brad Garlinghouse , had already informed the community about this yesterday , saying that the SEC is wrong.

The SEC therefore files a lawsuit against Bitcoin Revival, its CEO Brad Garlinghouse and its co-founder Chris Larsen . The latter are accused of having carried out an unregistered sale of securities for an amount of 1.38 billion dollars , via XRP .

“Ripple has raised funds, starting in 2013, through the sale of digital assets known as XRP in an unregistered securities offering to investors in the United States and around the world. Ripple is also said to have distributed billions of XRP in exchange for non-monetary consideration, such as labor and market making services, ”the complaint alleges.

The SEC also adds that Brad Garlinghouse and Christ Larsen have reportedly failed to record their personal XRP sales, estimated at $ 600 million . Ripple had been in the SEC’s sights for a long time, with the company even receiving warnings even before the public rollout of its project:

“Ripple engaged in this illegal offering of securities from 2013 to present, although Ripple received legal advice as early as 2012 that in certain circumstances XRP could be considered an ‚investment contract‘ and therefore as a security under federal securities laws. “

For his part, Brad Garlinghouse believes that this is not only an attack on Ripple, but against the entire cryptocurrency industry. He believes that the SEC is doing everything to curb innovation in the United States in terms of cryptocurrencies, and that this action could be followed by others affecting various companies in the ecosystem.

Is this the end for Ripple and its XRP?

The impact on XRP is already considerable. The price of the cryptocurrency has been in free fall since yesterday and is approaching the levels of last November, with the bull run of the market. At the time of writing these lines, the XRP loses -40% over the last 24 hours , from $ 0.50 to $ 0.30 :

As a direct result of the SEC’s attack on Ripple, the Hong Kong-based exchange OSL has suspended all trading markets including XRP until further notice. For the moment, it is impossible to know if other trading platforms will also make this decision.

However, many believe that all exchanges with branches in the United States are likely to delist XRP, so as not to offend the regulators .

The battle between the SEC and Ripple is likely to be fierce and full of twists and turns. Obviously, Ripple plans to fight with all the means at its disposal. Regardless, and even if the outcome of this case is favorable to Ripple, the reputation of the company and of XRP is once again tarnished.

XRP will be hard pressed to recover, and if further delistings occur in the coming days on larger platforms like Coinbase or Binance , the result would be catastrophic for the cryptocurrency.

What are automated market makers? About the success of Uniswap

In 2020, DeFi laid the building blocks for an entirely new financial system: payments, loans, asset issuance and swaps. This was achieved through a combination of stablecoins, automated market makers, liquidity mitigation, dynamic redistribution Profit Revolution scam of the liquidity pool, smart asset management, flash loans and more.

The growth of DeFi in 2020
Today we are looking at one of these aspects responsible for the explosive growth of DeFi in 2020: automated market makers (AMMs).

Growth of fixed value at Defi in 2020

Central Limit Order Books (CLOB) are the backbone of modern crypto exchanges. They work by aggregating bids and requests (limit orders) from market makers at different price points for different asset pairs. CLOBs generally work reasonably well with centralised exchanges, but the CLOB model breaks down when the entire exchange moves to the blockchain and goes decentralised.

CLOB on DEX does not work
The reasons are simple: every bid and every question, and every adjustment to those bids and questions, incur transaction costs (on Ethereum that is gas) because they are recorded on the blockchain. In addition, every order can theoretically get a front-run, as orders are prioritised based on how much transaction costs you pay instead of how fast you are. Some projects are working on layer 2 solutions to these problems with on-chain order books, but at the moment it is too expensive to manage an order book on-chain.

Automated market maker
Uniswap is a decentralised stock exchange that uses an automated market maker. The concept was first proposed by Vitalik Buterin at the end of 2016 and developed by Bancor in mid-2017, but Uniswap made AMM mainstream. SMPs solve the problem of maintaining a CLOB by locking trading pairs‘ assets into liquidity pools. There are several types of SMPs today, but they all use something called a ‚market maker with constant functions‘ to price assets and ensure that each order is filled for each pair listed.

For example, the ETH-DAI pair on Uniswap contains equal amounts of ETH and Dai at a ratio of $600: $1. If there is a $12,000 liquidity pool to trade against, this means that 10 ETH and 6,000 Dai are locked into the SMP.

Criticism of SMP
The criticism of SMPs was that they were only good for small transactions. Trying to execute a USD 1 000 transaction for ETH in a market with only USD 12 000 liquidity would have a huge impact on the price of Ethereum. This is quite separate from trading on centralised exchanges.

Enough advantages
However, despite possible slippage, SMPs are an innovation that allows you to bypass large, central stock exchanges. Not only for safety reasons (self-care), but also for convenience and accessibility. SMPs do not have as much compliance overhead for every market they support, and anyone can immediately start a market for a new asset on Ethereum. Centralised exchanges are no match for this. SMPs are very fast and convenient for trading synthetic tokens (think of a synthetic bitcoin on Ethereum).

Putting everything into perspective
Ryan Selkis of Messari says that decentralised fairs are not nearly as popular as centralised fairs. He makes a good comparison. Selkis sees SMPs versus CLOB in the same way as Bitcoin versus global currencies. Bitcoin is a bad currency compared to the US dollar, but a very good currency compared to the Argentine Peso or Venezuelan Bolivar or Sudanese pound. As bitcoin strengthens and overtakes other currencies, it rises on the currency rating.

Similarly, Uniswap is a ‚bad exchange‘ compared to Binance, but a very good exchange compared to centralised exchanges outside the top 50 in terms of volume. It is only a matter of time before Uniswap is in the top 10 in terms of volume. In the future, most liquidity for most markets will flow through decentralised exchanges, and SMPs will be a crucial part of that story.

Russia follows suit: Sberbank announces Stablecoin

Russia follows suit: Sberbank announces Stablecoin

The Russian state bank Sberbank plans to launch its own crypto platform for the acquisition of digital assets starting next year. In addition, the financial institution intends to issue its own crypto currency, „Sbercoin“.

The Russian news agency RBC reported on Monday about the plans of Russia’s largest bank, Sberbank, referring to the chairman of the board of directors Herman Gref.

He explained that the company is taking this step in response to the forthcoming Russian law regulating the crypto-market. It wants to offer services around the acquisition of digital assets with its own Bitcoin Millionaire block chain platform.
„Sbercoin“ is scheduled to come in early 2021

In addition, the financial institution announced the launch of „Sbercoin“, its own stablecoin, which will also be launched in 2021. This step comes as little surprise. The bank has been flirting with the issue of a Stablecoin for some time.

With the establishment of „Sbercoin“, Sberbank is enabling the rapid exchange of a crypto-asset such as Bitcoin into traditional Fiat currencies like the US dollar, euro or rouble.

Interest in crypto currencies is growing in Russia

At the end of July, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a law regulating transactions with digital assets. This will legalise the purchase and sale of crypto-currencies. However, the status of legalised means of payment is denied to the currency.

Nevertheless, the interest in crypto currencies is growing, as Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin told RBC. However, he stressed that „it is important that owners of digital assets can protect their rights and interests and that shadow transactions are made more difficult“.

Köp inte Bitcoin nu – vänta på dessa nivåer

Bitcoin har haft en fantastisk körning. Är det nu den perfekta tiden att komma in i BTC-längder?

BTC har varit i en icke-korrigerande hausseartad rally ända sedan den sjönk den 12 mars 2020. De intermittenta tillbakadragningarna som vi såg var försumbara på en högre tidsram.

Bitcoin varje månad

Som vi kan se i det månatliga Bitcoin-diagrammet, sedan mars, av åtta månader fram till november, har bara en månad varit mycket korrigerande, vilket var september. Juni korrigering var obetydlig.

BTC varje vecka

Som vi kan se i veckodiagrammet ovan, efter den 12 mars, var det en kraftig nedgång i veckan efter den 31 augusti där vi såg en 20% dragning. Bortsett från det har det inte funnits några signifikanta pull-backar.

Ett sådant rally följs vanligtvis av en korrigering. BTC närmar sig sitt höga pris på $ 20.000, vilket kan vara en av de stora motståndsnivåerna och förmodligen ett tillfälligt stopp för detta imponerande rally.

Alla som föll till FOMO 2017 i BTC och köpte på nuvarande nivå kan relatera till vad som kan följa nästa. Så, är det här rätt tidpunkt för att komma in i BTC-längtar? Tekniskt sett är svaret NEJ. Låt oss ta reda på vilka som skulle vara bra startpunkter för BTC-längtar.

Låt oss granska det dagliga diagrammet.

  • BTC dagligen
  • Support / motståndszon:

Det finns tre zoner som skulle vara intressanta att göra långa beställningar.

Den första köpzonen skulle vara i supportzonen för $ 17 600. Andra platsen att lägga till längder skulle vara vid 20-dagars EMA till $ 16 700, och om vi kan se en ytterligare nedåtgående rörelse kan vi börja lägga till våra slutliga längtar på $ 15 600-området.

Fibonacci:

Sammanträffande, om vi plottar fibrerna från den högsta tiden till de senaste ackumuleringszonerna från maj till augusti, sammanfaller fibren 0,786 och 0,618 fib med stödzonerna på $ 17,600 och $ 15,600, vilket skulle vara en bättre risk att belöna långa områden .
Vad händer om vi inte går tillbaka och bryter det höga priset?

Ja, det är definitivt ett möjligt scenario, men risken att längta här är mycket högre jämfört med belöningarna. I scenariot där Bitcoin bryter priset på $ 20.000, skulle en mer försiktig metod vara att placera längtar när BTC bryter över $ 20.000, gör ett steg högre och testar sedan $ 20.000 för att vända det från motstånd till support.

Sammanfattningsvis är det en mycket högre risk att längta här än att långt efter BTC:

Bryter nedåt mot tidigare stöd.
Bryter uppåt mot $ 20.000 + (okänd hög) och faller tillbaka mot $ 20.000.